If you think the hysteria surrounding the shooting in Florida will not affect you, consider this:
In Wisconsin, a homeowner defends himself and his family from some inebriated person on his enclosed front porch at 1 a.m. The only reason I emphasize that it was enclosed is that it means that this person entered an enclosed structure that is part of this home. The homeowner confronts the person and instead of complying, the person approaches the homeowner. The homeowner fires a single shot from a handgun, killing the intruder.
Two things you will notice about this case:
1. Apparently, what constitutes a "child" or "kid" has now increased to 20 years-old.
2. Skin color means you are completely innocent regardless of the circumstances.
The protesters are already out in force and I'm sure this homeowner will face threats against him for protecting his family. Comparisons are being made to the Trayvon Martin shooting only because of the color of the individual's skin.
You will also notice the agenda of the media, here. Yet again, they are questioning self-defense laws when they are not even the issue. The laws governing self defense would still apply here regardless of Wisconsin's castle law. This man was the only thing standing between an intruder who had entered a structure in his home and his wife and children. What decision do you make in that situation? You only have one chance to get it right as the person approaches you in the dark.